{
  "version": 1,
  "title": "Section-Audit Map",
  "subject": "tracing planted flaws to evidence-scoped responses",
  "eyebrow": "IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · regular research paper · teaching fixture",
  "summary": "A synthetic Results and Conclusion excerpt for a designated IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid regular research paper target, mapped finding by finding. Each numbered entry preserves the concern layer, identifies the sentence that triggered the finding, and shows the bounded repair or author action supported by the fixture's supplied evidence or verified venue guidance.",
  "source_label": "Flawed source",
  "revision_label": "Evidence-scoped response",
  "footer": "Generated on 3 August 2026 by applying the checked-in ieee-acm-paper-writing skill to section-audit-example.md. The realistic fixture is synthetic: its system, numbers, and citation are invented. The designated venue target is real, and the displayed figure-citation rule was rechecked on 3 August 2026 against the IEEE Editorial Style Manual for Authors at https://journals.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/IEEE-Editorial-Style-Manual-for-Authors.pdf and the IEEE PES Author's Kit. This retained example run demonstrates the output contract; it is not behavioral benchmark evidence.",
  "findings": [
    {
      "id": "1",
      "layer": "scientific-support",
      "severity": "Major",
      "title": "Unscoped optimality claim",
      "location": "V. Results · paragraph 1",
      "source": "The warm-started solver finds the optimal dispatch in every instance.",
      "evidence": "The submitted excerpt gives no solver status, MIP-gap tolerance, or time limit. A warm start does not itself certify optimality.",
      "consequence": "The sentence claims a guarantee that cannot be reconstructed from the reported experiment.",
      "correction": "After the author supplies the missing solver evidence, report the actual certificate: every warm-started instance terminated with solver status optimal at the stated 0.01% relative MIP-gap tolerance and 60 s limit.",
      "disposition": "rewrite"
    },
    {
      "id": "2",
      "layer": "scientific-support",
      "severity": "Major",
      "title": "Bare 23% solve-time claim",
      "location": "V. Results · paragraph 2",
      "source": "Our method reduces solve time by 23%.",
      "evidence": "The excerpt omits the instance count, aggregation statistic, baseline configuration, and matched solver settings.",
      "consequence": "The reader cannot determine whether 23% is a mean, median, best case, or unmatched comparison.",
      "correction": "With the supplied evidence, state that the value is the median solve-time reduction across 500 held-out instances relative to an identically configured cold start.",
      "disposition": "rewrite"
    },
    {
      "id": "3",
      "layer": "scientific-support",
      "severity": "Major",
      "title": "Significance asserted without a test",
      "location": "V. Results · paragraph 2",
      "source": "Our method significantly outperforms the conventional MILP baseline.",
      "evidence": "No statistical test, p-value, confidence interval, or uncertainty summary is supplied.",
      "consequence": "The word significantly implies statistical support that the evidence packet does not provide.",
      "correction": "Remove the statistical-significance wording. Report only the supplied descriptive comparison and request uncertainty or distributional evidence separately.",
      "disposition": "remove"
    },
    {
      "id": "4",
      "layer": "scientific-support",
      "severity": "Major",
      "title": "Best-case cost reduction presented as typical",
      "location": "V. Results · paragraph 2 and VI. Conclusion",
      "source": "In the most demanding winter-peak scenario, operating cost falls by 41%, which demonstrates the economic value of the approach in realistic conditions.",
      "evidence": "The 41% value comes from one instance whose cold start returned a time-limited, suboptimal incumbent rather than a certified optimum.",
      "consequence": "The draft generalizes a scenario-specific comparison to the complete evaluation set and to realistic operation.",
      "correction": "Identify the single winter-peak instance, the time-limited comparator, and the suboptimal-incumbent boundary; explicitly state that 41% is not a general operating-cost reduction.",
      "disposition": "rewrite"
    },
    {
      "id": "5",
      "layer": "method-domain",
      "severity": "Major",
      "title": "Missing reproducibility settings",
      "location": "V. Results · paragraph 1",
      "source": "All experiments use our 34-bus test feeder.",
      "evidence": "The submitted excerpt gives no solver name or version, time limit, MIP-gap setting, matched baseline configuration, seeds, or hardware.",
      "consequence": "The optimization comparison cannot be reconstructed or assessed for configuration bias.",
      "correction": "Insert the supplied Gurobi 10.0, 60 s, and 0.01% relative MIP-gap settings and state that cold- and warm-started runs use the identical formulation and solver configuration except for initialization. Request any still-missing hardware and seed details outside the manuscript prose.",
      "disposition": "author-query"
    },
    {
      "id": "6",
      "layer": "scientific-support",
      "severity": "Major",
      "title": "Unverifiable corroborating citation",
      "location": "V. Results · paragraph 2",
      "source": "A comparable speedup was independently confirmed in [17], further validating our design choices.",
      "evidence": "The fixture supplies neither the identity nor the content of reference [17], so its claim support cannot be checked.",
      "consequence": "An unverified citation becomes load-bearing evidence for the manuscript's own result.",
      "correction": "Drop the corroboration sentence. Do not replace it unless the cited source is independently verified to support the exact scoped comparison.",
      "disposition": "remove"
    },
    {
      "id": "7",
      "layer": "method-domain",
      "severity": "Major",
      "title": "Evaluation split is ambiguous",
      "location": "V. Results · paragraph 3",
      "source": "The model was evaluated on held-out scenarios drawn from the same year of feeder data.",
      "evidence": "The excerpt does not state whether training and evaluation are temporally or scenario-level disjoint.",
      "consequence": "Potential leakage prevents a defensible claim about held-out performance.",
      "correction": "Report the supplied temporal split: train on January–September and evaluate on 500 October–December instances from the same feeder year. Do not imply cross-feeder or cross-year generalization.",
      "disposition": "rewrite"
    },
    {
      "id": "8",
      "layer": "scientific-support",
      "severity": "Major",
      "title": "Absolute negative claim lacks scope",
      "location": "V. Results · paragraph 3",
      "source": "Across the evaluation set, the warm start never degraded solver performance.",
      "evidence": "The submitted excerpt does not define the evaluation-set size or composition and does not identify which performance measure never degraded.",
      "consequence": "Never reads as an unbounded universal rather than a finite observation.",
      "correction": "Scope the statement to the 500 evaluated instances and to solve time: the warm start did not increase solve time in any instance relative to the identically configured cold start.",
      "disposition": "rewrite"
    },
    {
      "id": "9",
      "layer": "scientific-support",
      "severity": "Critical",
      "title": "Universal proof claim exceeds the study",
      "location": "VI. Conclusion · sentence 1",
      "source": "This paper proved that learning-assisted warm starting makes mixed-integer dispatch tractable for real-time operation in all operating conditions.",
      "evidence": "The fixture contains a finite simulation study on one 34-bus feeder and no operational deployment or real-time validation.",
      "consequence": "The Conclusion converts bounded experimental observations into a universal proof and deployment claim.",
      "correction": "Replace the universal statement with the finite study boundary: the reported certificates and timing observations apply to the 34-bus feeder, 500-instance evaluation set, trained initializer, solver settings, and time limit.",
      "disposition": "rewrite"
    },
    {
      "id": "10",
      "layer": "scientific-support",
      "severity": "Critical",
      "title": "New generalization claims appear only in the Conclusion",
      "location": "VI. Conclusion · sentence 3",
      "source": "The framework generalizes to transmission-level unit commitment and to networks with high renewable penetration, making it directly deployable by system operators.",
      "evidence": "No result in the fixture evaluates transmission-level systems, substantially higher renewable penetration, or operational deployment.",
      "consequence": "The Conclusion claims external validity and readiness beyond the Results section and supplied evidence.",
      "correction": "State that these settings were not evaluated and make no generalization or deployment claim for them.",
      "disposition": "remove"
    },
    {
      "id": "11",
      "layer": "scientific-support",
      "severity": "Major",
      "title": "Future work is phrased as an expected result",
      "location": "VI. Conclusion · final sentence",
      "source": "Future versions will incorporate battery degradation, which we expect to further improve economic performance.",
      "evidence": "Battery degradation is not implemented or evaluated in the fixture.",
      "consequence": "A planned method extension is presented with an unsupported anticipated outcome.",
      "correction": "State only that incorporating battery degradation into the formulation is left to future work.",
      "disposition": "rewrite"
    },
    {
      "id": "12",
      "layer": "venue-compliance",
      "severity": "Editorial",
      "title": "Figure citation does not follow verified IEEE style",
      "location": "V. Results · paragraph 2",
      "source": "Figure 1 summarizes the solve-time comparison.",
      "evidence": "The designated target is an IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid regular research paper. The IEEE Editorial Style Manual for Authors requires figure citations in running text to use the abbreviation “Fig.”, including at the start of a sentence; the applicable IEEE/PES guidance was rechecked on 3 August 2026.",
      "consequence": "The sentence violates a verified venue-style rule, although the defect does not change the scientific meaning of the result.",
      "correction": "Write: “Fig. 1 summarizes the solve-time comparison.”",
      "disposition": "rewrite"
    }
  ]
}